Sildenafil citrate (ViagraŽ)
The results of
treatment with ViagraŽ were reported recently in a comprehensive paper that
gave an account of two studies (9). The first, which was double-blind,
described the results in men who were randomly assigned to treatment with
placebo (216 men), or 25 mg (96), 50 mg (105), or 100 mg (101) of ViagraŽ,
taken one hour before they planned to have sex (and not more than once
daily). The men who were studied had impotence of organic, psychological, or
mixed origin. Men with anatomical defects of the penis, another sexual
disorder, spinal cord injury, major psychiatric disorder, poorly controlled
diabetes, or stroke, or a heart attack within six months, or treatment with
organic nitrates, were excluded.
The mean age
was 58 years. About 80% of the subjects had organic causes for an average of
3 years, and about 28% had hypertension, 18% hyperlipidaemia, 14% diabetes,
11% radical prostatectomy and 8% ischaemic heart disease. Efficacy of
treatment was assessed from the answers to the questions "When you attempted
sexual intercourse, how often were you able to penetrate your partner?" and
"During sexual intercourse, how often were you able to maintain an erection
after you had penetrated your partner?"
With doses of
50 and 100 mg there was a change from erections that were rarely adequate
for penetration and rarely maintained to erections that were both adequate
and maintained about 75% of the time. Effectiveness was broadly similar for
men whose impotence had an organic, psychological or mixed cause.
The second
study, which was also double blind, involved 329 different men who were
randomly assigned to treatment with placebo (160 men) or 50 mg of ViagraŽ
(163 men) for 12 weeks. At follow-up visits the dose was doubled, or reduced
by 50%, on the basis of effectiveness and adverse effects. The mean number
of successful attempts at sexual intercourse during the last four weeks of
treatment was 5.9 with ViagraŽ, compared with 1.5 with placebo. Successful
sexual intercourse occurred in 69% of attempts with ViagraŽ and 22% with
placebo. Improved erections were reported by 101 of 136 men taking ViagraŽ
and 23 of 118 taking placebo. There was no change reported in the level of
sexual desire.
In the UK, the
recommended dose is 50 mg. In older men, or those with cardiovascular or
renal disease, the recommended starting dose is 25 mg.
Adverse
effects
The main
adverse effects reported in the paper were flushing, headache, dyspepsia,
visual disturbance (changes in perception of colour hue or brightness) and
rhinitis. These were mild, and the number of discontinuations because of
adverse effects was small at 5 of 479 patients (<1%). There were no cases of
priapism (painful or uncomfortable erection persisting for several hours
after ejaculation) in these studies.
A more
complete picture of adverse events comes from an analysis of all randomised
and double blind placebo-controlled studies, together with open-label
extensions (10). The Table below, taken from reference 10, provides
information on the 1500 men given ViagraŽ or placebo in flexible-dose
studies, those most likely to reflect drug use in clinical practice. Over
90% of adverse effects were mild or moderate, and discontinuations of
treatment because of adverse effects in these studies were just over 2% for
both placebo and ViagraŽ. Though there were no cases of priapism in this
study, there have recently been six cases of priapism recorded. It is likely
that the risk of this is dose-related.
| Major adverse
aspects of ViagraŽ in flexible-dosing studies |
| Adverse effect |
Placebo
(N=725) |
ViagraŽ
(N=734) |
| |
|
|
| Headache |
4% |
16% |
| Flushing |
1% |
10% |
| Dyspepsia |
2% |
7% |
| Rhinitis |
2% |
4% |
| Diarrhoea |
1% |
3% |
| |
|
|
| Adverse
effects were mild or moderate in 92% of cases |
Because men
prescribed ViagraŽ may well have cardiovascular risk factors, such as
hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes, any effect of the drug on
cardiovascular events is very important. An analysis of all 18
placebo-controlled trials detected no difference in the incidence of
myocardial infarction, angina or coronary artery disorders between men
treated with ViagraŽ and those taking placebo (4274 men), nor was the
incidence higher in the 2199 men taking part in open-label extensions. Blood
pressure and heart rate were unaffected.
The overall
incidence of abnormal vision was 6.5% for ViagraŽ versus 0.4% for placebo.
Abnormal vision was commonly described as a transient colour tinge to
vision, an increased perception of light, or blurred vision. Most cases were
mild or moderate. Patients with untreated proliferative diabetic retinopathy
or macular degeneration have not been included in significant numbers. Two
patients with retinal detachment have been reported.
It is a truism of drug regulation that, at the
time of introduction, we expect to have a pretty clear idea of efficacy, but
that the full safety profile of a medication is only learnt when many
patients have used it over a reasonable period of time. The evidence thus
far is that ViagraŽ is effective and safe. Most of the men studied had
medical conditions associated with impotence, although men with spinal
injuries were excluded. While more experience is required, the picture that
is emerging is an optimistic one that this medication will bring relief to a
substantial proportion of men suffering from a condition that has hitherto
eluded safe, effective and acceptable treatment.
Treatment
efficacy for ViagraŽ is about the same as for intracavernosal injection or
intraurethral application of alprostadil (see below). Adverse effects are,
however, different. Because of the mode of action of ViagraŽ, potentiation
of the blood pressure-lowering effects of nitrates is expected, and indeed
was demonstrated in early studies. Its use in men treated with organic
nitrates is therefore contraindicated.
|